Skip to main content (access key =1)
  • Login
CONSORT

Support CONSORT

  • Home
  • CONSORT Statement
  • Extensions
  • About CONSORT
  • Resources
  • Database
  • News
  • CONSORT Statement
  • CONSORT Statement Extensions
  • Evidence underpinning CONSORT
    • Accrual and sample size
    • Attitudes to trials
    • Adverse events (Harms)
    • Baseline data
    • Blinding
    • Compliance
    • Early stopping
    • Eligibility
    • Follow-up
    • Funding
    • Generalizability
    • Harms
    • Intention to treat
    • Interpretation
    • Interventions
    • Outcome reporting
    • Random allocation
    • Recruitment
    • Statistical analysis
    • Statistical methods
    • Trial design issues
      • Cluster trials
      • Crossover trials
      • Equivalence trials
      • Factorial trials
      • Multi-centre trials
      • N of 1 trials
      • Small trial bias
    • Trial registration
  • Uptake of CONSORT by journals
  • Impact of and adherence to CONSORT
  • Endorsement of CONSORT

Crossover trials

Khan KS, Daya S, Collins JA, Walter SD. Empirical evidence of bias in infertility research: overestimation of treatment effect in crossover trials using pregnancy as the outcome measure. Fertil Steril 1996; 65(5):939-945.
PMID: 8612853

 

 

Page last edited: 08 May 2009

    Minervation logoDesigned and managed by Minervation