- CONSORT Statement
- CONSORT Statement Extensions
- Evidence underpinning CONSORT
- Accrual and sample size
- Attitudes to trials
- Adverse events (Harms)
- Baseline data
- Blinding
- Compliance
- Early stopping
- Eligibility
- Follow-up
- Funding
- Generalizability
- Harms
- Intention to treat
- Interpretation
- Interventions
- Outcome reporting
- Random allocation
- Recruitment
- Statistical analysis
- Statistical methods
- Trial design issues
- Trial registration
- Uptake of CONSORT by journals
- Impact of and adherence to CONSORT
- Endorsement of CONSORT
Small trial bias
Bhandari M, Lochner H, Tornetta P, III.
Effect of continuous versus dichotomous outcome variables on study power when
sample sizes of orthopaedic randomized trials are small. Arch Orthop Trauma
Surg 2002; 122(2):96-98.
PMID: 11880910
Dickinson K, Bunn F, Wentz R, Edwards P, Roberts I. Size
and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published
studies. BMJ 2000; 320(7245):1308-1311.
PMID: 10807622
Harrington DP. The tea leaves of small trials. J Clin Oncol
1999; 17(5):1336-1338.
PMID: 10334516
Hotopf M, Lewis G, Normand C. Putting trials on trial--the
costs and consequences of small trials in depression: a systematic review of
methodology. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51(4):354-358.
PMID: 9328538
Page last edited: 08 May 2009
